From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jan 27 22:15:42 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from net2.dinoex.sub.org (net2.dinoex.de [212.184.201.182]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02AA037B402 for ; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 22:15:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from gate.dinoex.sub.org (dinoex@localhost) by net2.dinoex.sub.org (8.11.2/8.11.2) with BSMTP id f0S6F3d01896 for ; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 07:15:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org) X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: From: dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org (Dirk Meyer) Organization: privat Subject: Re: LAME domains, sendmail BIND and FreeBSD- its FreeBSD specific it seems (was more strange DNS issues in BIND and STABLE.)- Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 07:14:00 +0100 X-Mailer: Dinoex 1.77 References: <034601c08827$b8e08d80$1385f1d8@kconline.com> <4.2.2.20010127001841.03015358@marble.sentex.net> <4.2.2.20010127204048.013addb0@marble.sentex.net> X-Gateway: ZCONNECT gate.dinoex.sub.org [UNIX/Connect 0.90] X-Accept-Language: de,en X-PGP-Fingerprint: 44 16 EC 0A D3 3A 4F 28 8A 8A 47 93 F1 CF 2F 12 X-Noad: Please don't send me ad's by mail. I'm bored by this type of mail. X-Copyright: (C) Copyright 1999 by Dirk Meyer -- All rights reserved. X-Note: sending SPAM is a violation of both german and US law and will at least trigger a complaint at your provider's postmaster. X-PGP-Key-Avail: mailto:pgp-public-keys@keys.de.pgp.net Subject:GET 0x331CDA5D X-ZC-VIA: 20010128000000W+1@dinoex.sub.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mike Tancsa wrote:, > OK, after trying out a few things, I think sendmail on FreeBSD is the > actual culprit here. I downloaded sendmail 8.11.2 from sendmail.org, built > and installed it, used the stock freebsd.mc file to generate a new .cf... > Lo and behold, this version will deliver to LAME domains. could you try and build Sendmail from ports? > Comments ? What is different about sendmail on FreeBSD that would account > for this behaviour ? There are no functiuonla patches to sendmail in the Release, but the Build enviroment is diffrent. The port keeps the original enviroment of the build. So this might show a diffrence here. build from STABLE/RELEASE: cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/src -I/usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/include -DNEWDB -DNIS -DNETINET6 -DTCPWRAPPERS -DMAP_REGEX -DSTARTTLS -D_FFR_TLS_O_T -D_FFR_TLS_1 -D_FFR_TLS_TOREK -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include -c /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/src/main.c build from ports: (SENDMAIL_WITH_TSL=yes) cc -O -I. -I../../include -DNEWDB -DNIS -DMAP_REGEX -DTCPWRAPPERS -DNETINET6 -DSTARTTLS -D_FFR_TLS_O_T -D_FFR_TLS_1 -D_FFR_TLS_TOREK -c main.c If you build sendmail from scratch it does behave diffrent: - you won't have TSL support - it won't uses the TCPWRAPPERS - you don't have support for NETINET6 I would guess one of the 3 functions cause the problem. Please tweak the lines in the sendmail port: files/site.config.m4 to build without NETINET6 or without TCPWRAPPERS. I would like to know the results. kind regards Dirk - Dirk Meyer, Im Grund 4, 34317 Habichtswald, Germany - Tel. +49-5606-6512 - Tel. +49-177-6923813 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message