From owner-freebsd-current Fri Mar 3 22:23: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from coconut.itojun.org (coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EB5A37B5E0 for ; Fri, 3 Mar 2000 22:23:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from itojun@itojun.org) Received: from kiwi.itojun.org (localhost.itojun.org [127.0.0.1]) by coconut.itojun.org (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W) with ESMTP id PAA12486; Sat, 4 Mar 2000 15:22:48 +0900 (JST) To: "Louis A. Mamakos" Cc: current@freebsd.org In-reply-to: louie's message of Fri, 03 Mar 2000 19:47:27 EST. <200003040047.TAA02376@whizzo.transsys.com> X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD 90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2 Subject: Re: IPSec in 4.0-current questions.. From: itojun@iijlab.net Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2000 15:22:48 +0900 Message-ID: <12484.952150968@coconut.itojun.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >I've been messing about with IPSEC in 4.0-current, and have observed some >unexpected behavior. Is there someone I can swap some email with off >the list to determine if what I'm seeing is a bug, or I'm just confused? >It has to do with security policy specifications and what SAID is being >selected when a TCP connection is being opened. could you try sending details to snap-users@kame.net (KAME users mailing list, you may want to subscribe it - see www.kam.enet). itojun To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message