From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Aug  7 21:41:57 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3956A37B401; Thu,  7 Aug 2003 21:41:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org
	(adsl-64-169-107-97.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.107.97])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 626CB43F93; Thu,  7 Aug 2003 21:41:56 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5])
	by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 89F1566D74; Thu,  7 Aug 2003 21:41:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 4BF55649; Thu,  7 Aug 2003 21:41:54 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 21:41:54 -0700
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: "Alan L. Cox" <alc@imimic.com>
Message-ID: <20030808044154.GA96980@rot13.obsecurity.org>
References: <20030807204641.GC76161@rot13.obsecurity.org>
	<3F332226.B9C7EE2@imimic.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3F332226.B9C7EE2@imimic.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
cc: alc@FreeBSD.org
cc: current@FreeBSD.org
cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject: Re: LOR (vm_fault.c:286 and vm_kern.c:323)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 04:41:57 -0000


--1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 11:08:06PM -0500, Alan L. Cox wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >=20
> > I don't think I've seen this i386 traceback before.  Is it harmless as
> > well?
> >=20
>=20
> Yes.  In general, any LOR involving a system map mutex and a vm object
> mutex that has a stack trace looking like
>=20
> _mtx_lock_flags()
> _vm_map_lock()
> kmem_malloc()
> page_alloc()
> slab_zalloc()
> uma_zone_slab()
> uma_zalloc_internal()
> uma_zfree_arg()
> ...
>=20
> is not a problem.

Thanks, I'll keep that in mind.

Kris

--1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE/MyoRWry0BWjoQKURAtKLAKDrj48NrHKa5uffEiyr+O1FLju6VACeI4hw
wDcwU1zEJkV1HmDkMZ13+Vc=
=muDu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7--