From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Feb 24 6:49:27 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9157637B401; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 06:49:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from mbox.cksoft.de (mbox.cksoft.de [62.111.66.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D554D43FA3; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 06:49:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ck@cksoft.de) Received: from mbox.cksoft.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mbox.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 761AE1628ED; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 15:49:23 +0100 (CET) Received: by mbox.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B26891628E4; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 15:49:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mbox.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF71C1628BB; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 15:49:22 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 15:49:22 +0100 (CET) From: Christian Kratzer To: Edwin Groothuis Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: net/openldap-related ports In-Reply-To: <20030224062444.GA62020@k7.mavetju> Message-ID: <20030224153927.I77049@mbox.cksoft.de> References: <20030224062444.GA62020@k7.mavetju> X-Spammer-Kill-Ratio: 75% MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020300-cksoft-02bz on mbox.cksoft.de Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > FYI: > > net/openldap has been renamed to net/openldap12 > net/openldap2 has been renamed to net/openldap20 > new is net/openldap21 I have a slight cosmetic problem with the way this was implementd. ;- I have no prolem with the directories being called openldap12, openldap20 and openldap21. This is fine with me. The problem ist that the PORTNAME has also been set to respective directory names. This currently gets us following package names net/openldap12 --> openldap12-1.2.13.tgz net/openldap20 --> openldap20-2.0.25.tgz net/openldap21 --> openldap21-2.1.12.tgz which I consider rather ugly ;(( I would have preferred net/openldap12 --> openldap-1.2.13.tgz net/openldap20 --> openldap-2.0.25.gz net/openldap21 --> openldap-2.1.12.tgz We have the version in the PORTVERSION already. A version prefix of some kind in the PORTNAME is redundant and looks ugly. We can set LATEST_LINK to respective directory names in order to get dependencies setup correctly like In openldap12/Makefile PORTNAME= openldap PORTVERSION= 1.2.13 LATEST_LINK= openldap12 In openldap20/Makefile PORTNAME= openldap PORTVERSION= 2.0.25 LATEST_LINK= openldap20 In openldap20/Makefile PORTNAME= openldap PORTVERSION= 2.1.12 LATEST_LINK= openldap21 If we can get a concensus on this I could send 3 quick pr's to fix the three openldap ports before this gets distributed too much. I hope this was just an oversight in the long awaited repocopy frenzy earlier today ... Greetings Christian -- CK Software GmbH Christian Kratzer, Schwarzwaldstr. 31, 71131 Jettingen Email: ck@cksoft.de Phone: +49 7452 889-135 Open Software Solutions, Network Security Fax: +49 7452 889-136 FreeBSD spoken here! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message