From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jul 31 14:50:00 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5EA437B401
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:50:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp4.server.rpi.edu (smtp4.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.4])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBF7943FDD
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:49:59 -0700 (PDT)	(envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu)
Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47])
	by smtp4.server.rpi.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6VLnuRD010238;
	Thu, 31 Jul 2003 17:49:58 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu
Message-Id: <p052106acbb4f3e74d79a@[128.113.24.47]>
In-Reply-To: <bgb67e$12kl$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de>
References: <20030730212049.GI33188@sunbay.com>
 <20030730162320.A66578@FreeBSD.org> <20030730212744.GJ33188@sunbay.com>
 <20030730163705.A68092@FreeBSD.org> <bgb67e$12kl$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 17:49:55 -0400
To: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber),
	freebsd-current@freebsd.org
From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca)
Subject: Re: make -U
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 21:50:01 -0000

At 1:39 PM +0000 7/31/03, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>
>  > Why go thru those contortions?  I sometimes use "make FOO=" to
>  > define things.  -U obviously has a place, if it not existing
>  > means I have to  have all these contortions to do a fairly
>  > obvious thing, yeah?
>
>What are the exact semantics of -U supposed to be?

 From the message in freebsd-hackers which first introduced
this patch:

- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:09:17 -0700
- From: Faried Nawaz <fn@hungry.com>
- Subject: patch to add make -U

     While working around a port issue (ports/55013), I discovered
     that make couldn't unset variables using make -U.  I've written
     a small patch that adds -U functionality, but I haven't tested
     it extensively.

     http://web.nilpotent.org/tmp/make.diff.bz2  (~ 3KB unpacked)
     against yesterday's -CURRENT code.

     A simple Makefile I used to test it:

     -- cut here --
     FOO = bar

     .ifdef FOO
     SAY = y
     .else
     SAY = n
     .endif

     all:
    	echo $(SAY)
     -- cut here --

     Try "make -U FOO".

Personally I think this is a reasonable option to implement.
An undefined variable is not the same as a variable which is
defined to be a null string.

-- 
Garance Alistair Drosehn            =   gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu
Senior Systems Programmer           or  gad@freebsd.org
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute    or  drosih@rpi.edu