From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 9 13:29:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35DD3106566B for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 13:29:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from shell0.rawbw.com (shell0.rawbw.com [198.144.192.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0357D8FC0A for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 13:29:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eagle.yuri.org (stunnel@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell0.rawbw.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p49CphGe071574; Mon, 9 May 2011 05:51:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Message-ID: <4DC7E4A1.6000000@rawbw.com> Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 05:57:05 -0700 From: Yuri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101211 Thunderbird/3.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bernhard Froehlich References: <430fcb25aefc374bf256e45e3151de15@bluelife.at> In-Reply-To: <430fcb25aefc374bf256e45e3151de15@bluelife.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Call for Testers: VirtualBox 4.0.6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 13:29:57 -0000 I think 4.0.6 is quite stable now. Is it really less stable than the current version in ports 3.2.12? Why don't you at least put them into ports/emulators repository with -devel suffix like many other ports do? So that there is no need to go through the third party repository. Yuri