From owner-freebsd-perl@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat May  2 19:38:49 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-perl@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: perl@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 749A046D
 for <perl@freebsd.org>; Sat,  2 May 2015 19:38:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ans.signature.nl (ans.signature.nl
 [IPv6:2a01:7c8:aab1:31a::160])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E1CF1CB1
 for <perl@freebsd.org>; Sat,  2 May 2015 19:38:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ans.signature.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001)
 id 0CDC3E77381; Sat,  2 May 2015 21:38:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by ans.signature.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08F47E77380
 for <perl@freebsd.org>; Sat,  2 May 2015 21:38:39 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 2 May 2015 21:38:39 +0200 (CEST)
From: Henk van Oers <hvo.pm@xs4all.nl>
X-X-Sender: henk@ans.signature.nl
To: perl@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Unmaintained perl ports
In-Reply-To: <EA129229-7012-4367-A026-9908981E01CA@adamw.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1505022135071.28628@ans.signature.nl>
References: <EA129229-7012-4367-A026-9908981E01CA@adamw.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-BeenThere: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: maintainer of a number of perl-related ports
 <freebsd-perl.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-perl>,
 <mailto:freebsd-perl-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-perl/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-perl@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-perl-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-perl>,
 <mailto:freebsd-perl-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 May 2015 19:38:49 -0000


On Sat, 2 May 2015, Adam Weinberger wrote:
>
> What's our perspective on perl ports maintained by perl@?

s/perl@/ports@/

> For the most part, those ports don't get updated or improved very often.
> I tend only to scan portscout for perl@ ports.
>
> I was thinking about assigning those modules to perl@. What do you think of that idea?

OK.

-- 
Henk