From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 9 03:52:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88DE516A4CE; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 03:52:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wyvern.icir.org (wyvern.icir.org [192.150.187.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 655F743D46; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 03:52:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mallman@icir.org) Received: from guns.icir.org (adsl-68-76-113-50.dsl.bcvloh.ameritech.net [68.76.113.50]) by wyvern.icir.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id iA93q4D3085455; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 19:52:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mallman@icir.org) Received: from lawyers.icir.org (guns.icir.org [68.76.113.50]) by guns.icir.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B3F77AD0D; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 22:52:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from lawyers.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lawyers.icir.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ED891FB5E2; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 22:52:03 -0500 (EST) To: Randall Stewart From: Mark Allman In-Reply-To: <417A5B28.9080308@stewart.chicago.il.us> Organization: ICSI Center for Internet Research (ICIR) Song-of-the-Day: Back in Black MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 22:52:03 -0500 Sender: mallman@icir.org Message-Id: <20041109035203.9ED891FB5E2@lawyers.icir.org> cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org cc: Andre Oppermann cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: mallman@icir.org List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 03:52:05 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain (catching up ...) > I would rather have Andre work with me to get any other > rinkles out of SCTP that he deems are there... and get the > KAME-SCTP stack ported directly in to FreeBSD.. this IMO ... would > make more sense... Get something that is pretty well baked (IMO at > least) and work to get it "productionized" (even though I don't > feel it needs much work in this vein)... I do not prefer xor. I agree that it'd be nice if SCTP was rolled into freebsd. But, these things seem orthogonal to me. allman -- Mark Allman -- ICIR -- http://www.icir.org/mallman/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iD8DBQFBkD7jWyrrWs4yIs4RAo8UAJ9FV5ntNoD9L3PqIa1X5jj5gVpupACfUvC5 VFAjdGGFocvL54rph/JV5uI= =7iGy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--