From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org  Mon Oct 17 19:51:03 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B467DAF4303
 for <freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Mon, 17 Oct 2016 19:51:03 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A44D5D92
 for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 19:51:03 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u9HJp2Z8083236
 for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 19:51:03 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 213474] sed behaviuor with a/i/c operands.
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 19:51:03 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System
X-Bugzilla-Component: bin
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-STABLE
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People
X-Bugzilla-Who: pfg@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-213474-8-nIM7NMChpV@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-213474-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-213474-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-bugs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 19:51:03 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D213474

--- Comment #1 from Pedro F. Giffuni <pfg@FreeBSD.org> ---
I am not sure this can be classified as a regression.

It is certainly a change in behavior with the idea of being more compatible
with GNU sed: some people may be moving from linux to FreeBSD and may
appreciate the compatibility.

Standards don't force either behavior though, and I do see it would be some=
what
advantageous to do some things different than GNU sed, but I am completely
agnostic here.

If we revert to the previous behavior I would prefer it be done fast but OT=
OH,
the damage is already done for 11.0.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=