From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Dec  8 14:00:19 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 211931065674
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Wed,  8 Dec 2010 14:00:19 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5B38FC15
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Wed,  8 Dec 2010 14:00:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB8E0I7D003424
	for <freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org>; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 14:00:18 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oB8E0IEl003418;
	Wed, 8 Dec 2010 14:00:18 GMT (envelope-from gnats)
Resent-Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 14:00:18 GMT
Resent-Message-Id: <201012081400.oB8E0IEl003418@freefall.freebsd.org>
Resent-From: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org (GNATS Filer)
Resent-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org,
	Monthadar <monthadar@gmail.com>
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D03901065674
	for <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>;
	Wed,  8 Dec 2010 13:51:06 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from nobody@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from red.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::22])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C019B8FC17
	for <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>;
	Wed,  8 Dec 2010 13:51:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from red.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by red.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB8Dp6ea021908
	for <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 13:51:06 GMT
	(envelope-from nobody@red.freebsd.org)
Received: (from nobody@localhost)
	by red.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oB8Dp6Js021907;
	Wed, 8 Dec 2010 13:51:06 GMT (envelope-from nobody)
Message-Id: <201012081351.oB8Dp6Js021907@red.freebsd.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 13:51:06 GMT
From: Monthadar <monthadar@gmail.com>
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
X-Send-Pr-Version: www-3.1
Cc: 
Subject: kern/152922: Routerstation Pro different flash model investigation
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 14:00:19 -0000


>Number:         152922
>Category:       kern
>Synopsis:       Routerstation Pro different flash model investigation
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    freebsd-bugs
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Wed Dec 08 14:00:18 UTC 2010
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Monthadar
>Release:        Current 201010
>Organization:
>Environment:
FreeBSD  9.0-CURRENT-201010 FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT-201010 #2: Mon Dec  6 05:36:56 UTC 2010     root@FreeBSD.NFS:/usr/obj/mips/mips.mips/usr/src/sys/RSPRO  mips
>Description:
It seems that RSPRO is using two different models of flash?

My RSPRO have MX25L12805D,
http://www.mxic.com.tw/QuickPlace/hq/PageLibrary482576EF002A2699.nsf/h_Index/30D2368B704F50B9482576EF002D070F/?OpenDocument&PartNo=MX25L12805D

While Adrian refer to a different (newer mode?)  flash model MX25L12845E?
http://wiki.freebsd.org/AdrianChadd/UbiquityRouterstationPro


Mine seems to be slower, Sector type of only 4KB and 64KB and bus
width of x1. 

Do you think there will be problems  with the driver because of compatibility issue or will it work good enough for both?
>How-To-Repeat:

>Fix:


>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: