Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 03:15:25 +0800 From: Jiawei Ye <leafy7382@gmail.com> To: Dominic Marks <dom@goodforbusiness.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portinstall .vs. make install clean Message-ID: <c21e92e205062612152cf8abd7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200506261940.16415.dom@goodforbusiness.co.uk> References: <f34868a305062611126c31b0cb@mail.gmail.com> <200506261929.27681.dom@goodforbusiness.co.uk> <20050626183253.GA51515@lancore.net.ua> <200506261940.16415.dom@goodforbusiness.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/27/05, Dominic Marks <dom@goodforbusiness.co.uk> wrote:
> On Sunday 26 June 2005 19:32, Sergey Spivak wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > portinstall is a ruby program which comes with portupgrade
> >
> > "portinstall" = "portupgrade -N"
>
> Oh. Makes me wonder why 'portinstall' exists at all.
>
> --
> Dominic
It is a bit more intuitive than "portupgrade -N" IMO.
Jiawei Ye
--
"Without the userland, the kernel is useless."
--inspired by The Tao of Programming
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c21e92e205062612152cf8abd7>