Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 20 May 1999 13:41:37 -0600
From:      Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>
To:        "G. Adam Stanislav" <adam@whizkidtech.net>
Cc:        Chuck Robey <chuckr@picnic.mat.net>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: c9x (new ANSI C) 
Message-ID:  <199905201941.NAA07094@harmony.village.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 19 May 1999 18:01:51 CDT." <19990519180151.A226@whizkidtech.net> 
References:  <19990519180151.A226@whizkidtech.net>  <19990519170823.A240@whizkidtech.net> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9905191811090.69006-100000@picnic.mat.net> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <19990519180151.A226@whizkidtech.net> "G. Adam Stanislav" writes:
: And the MS book was outright lying (gee, surprise): It claimed that
: one of the biggest advantages of C++ over C is that if you change
: the C++ class, you need not recompile the code using it. What a
: piece of bunk. In C++ the caller allocates the memory called by the
: class.

Some SGI compilers get around this somehow.  They are really much
nicer to work with than the cfront based compilers and their
descendants.

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199905201941.NAA07094>