Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 17:17:10 +0100 From: Stuart Henderson <stuart@eclipse.net.uk> To: Mitch Vincent <mitch@venux.net> Cc: "Lester A. Mesa" <netadmin@primex.prontel.net>, isp@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How many Virtual Hosts? Message-ID: <20000412171710.B32156@naiad.eclipse.net.uk> In-Reply-To: <006d01bfa494$4c287c60$4100000a@venux.net>; from mitch@venux.net on Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 11:32:22AM -0400 References: <006801bfa4f4$e6201160$38040a0a@prontel.com> <006d01bfa494$4c287c60$4100000a@venux.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 11:32:22AM -0400, Mitch Vincent wrote: > So the limit mentioned on Apache's site is more of a limit of the number of > IPs you can bind to any one interface (and the number of per-process file > descriptors you have).. It's not really a limit of Apache itself. > > We're approaching that number (255) on one of our Linux boxes, however we > use name based vhosting, so it's only one IP we're dealing with. If you are using multiple logfiles in Apache (rather than logging to a single file which is then split into multiple files at a later date/time) you will be holding hundreds of file handles open for each log that is open, in addition to the file handles required for the bound sockets. BTW, there's web servers other than Apache, you don't *have* to bind individually to each IP address... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000412171710.B32156>