From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jan 11 16:30:14 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from megahack.com (portal.megahack.com [206.230.54.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A38037B419 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:30:00 -0800 (PST) Received: (from steve@localhost) by megahack.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0C0TsW01023; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 18:29:54 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from steve) From: Steven Farmer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15423.33666.82371.60481@catbert.megahack.com> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 18:29:54 -0600 To: Chris Faulhaber Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Should /sbin/mount_smbfs be static? In-Reply-To: <20020111214829.GA1489@peitho.fxp.org> References: <15423.22138.622826.566389@catbert.megahack.com> <20020111214829.GA1489@peitho.fxp.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.00 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >>>>> "Chris" == Chris Faulhaber writes: Chris> Have you looked at src/sbin/mount_smbfs/Makefile? In Chris> particular: Ah, it's intentional then. I should obviously pay closer attention, because this one took me by surprise. Please correct me if I'm mistaken, but it appears that we now have a _dynamically linked program_ in /sbin, and this same program can't be statically linked so that it can use an LGPL'ed library from _ports_. Do I have this right? Eeeeuuuwww. Steve -- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message