From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 1 07:00:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCCF8CB8 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 07:00:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A297F8FC0C for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 07:00:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA17016m025785 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 07:00:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qA1701lt025784; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 07:00:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 07:00:01 GMT Message-Id: <201211010700.qA1701lt025784@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Michael Schuh Subject: Re: kern/173251: ACHI/ATA_CAM doesn't find any SATA Disk on ICH7 - Dell SC430 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Michael Schuh List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 07:00:01 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/173251; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Michael Schuh To: bug-followup@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/173251: ACHI/ATA_CAM doesn't find any SATA Disk on ICH7 - Dell SC430 Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 07:55:08 +0100 2012/11/1 Michael Schuh > > The RELEASE 8.3 is also affected. No SATA drives found. > > With RELEASE 8.2 the disks get detected correctly. i patched /usr/src/sys/dev/ata/chipsets/ata-intel.c. I reverted to the definitions of RELEASE 8.2 and now i can access all my drives. i added the patch to this message. ata-intel.c is my version, ata-intel.c.org the actual. No compiling errors no Timeouts. Peakperformance of 90MByte/S could getting reached without any errors. I am not really sure what my changed meaning in deep, but it seems to work correctly. probably a kernel hacker can supervise that. will be thankful for any feedback many thanks.