From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 2 20:29:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E5A106566C; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 20:29:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rflynn@acsalaska.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D507E8FC08; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 20:29:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (squeeze.lan.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.30]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C04277E84D; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 12:29:08 -0800 (AKDT) Message-ID: <4FCA7790.4040604@acsalaska.net> Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 22:29:04 +0200 From: Mel Flynn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Rees References: <4301C0E3-3C53-46E2-B5A5-7BD120CD775F@FreeBSD.org> <4FCA0DA6.7070502@acsalaska.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Baptiste Daroussin , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] New framework options aka optionng X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 20:29:11 -0000 On 2-6-2012 15:24, Chris Rees wrote: > On Jun 2, 2012 1:57 PM, "Mel Flynn" wrote: >> >> On 12-5-2012 5:41, Erwin Lansing wrote: >> >>> All the details has been documented and written down on the wiki: >>> http://wiki.freebsd.org/Ports/Options/OptionsNG >> >> Sorry to jump in late, but it just occurred to me that I have a valid >> case for "zero or 1" multi options or implemented slightly different, a >> case for "if single is on, multigroup needs one, else multigroup must be > 0" >> The specific case is this: >> - User can opt to force runtime dependency on a web server by selecting >> one of 4 or none. >> > > Just put a dummy option NOWEBSERVER or something in the singlegroup. I'll think I'll go for "NONE" to avoid NO/WITHOUT namespaces. -- Mel