From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 8 22:41:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 839161065673; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 22:41:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66B538FC15; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 22:41:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4873ED07.8060105@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:41:11 +0200 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <20080708100701.57031cda@twoflower.in.publishing.hu> <4873C4FA.2020004@FreeBSD.org> <4873E068.8060305@psg.com> <4873E0AE.6090305@psg.com> <4873ECE0.5090706@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4873ECE0.5090706@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thinking of using ZFS/FBSD for a backup system X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 22:41:07 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > mike wrote: >> On 7/8/08, Randy Bush wrote: >> >>> . first cuppa. it's 4g >> >> okay, so it sounds like from multiple people this could be doable and >> stable enough: >> >> dual or quad-core current gen processor (amd64) >> 4g ram >> 4 or 6x 1tb disks >> freebsd 7.0-release >> >> these tweaks to /boot/loader.conf: >> >> vm.kmem_size=600M >> vm.kmem_size_max=600M >> vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1 >> >> right? > > Might be enough kmem, if not, or if you want better performance from > increased caching, increase as high as 1500M > > Kris > > Also test with/without prefetch to see which is faster on your workload. Kris