From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Feb 21  1: 5:27 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from verdi.nethelp.no (verdi.nethelp.no [158.36.41.162])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 91BC81155A
	for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 21 Feb 1999 01:05:22 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no)
Received: (qmail 21713 invoked by uid 1001); 21 Feb 1999 09:05:22 +0000 (GMT)
To: jkb@best.com
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, FreeBSD-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: New breakin technique?
From: sthaug@nethelp.no
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 21 Feb 1999 00:56:15 -0800"
References: <19990221005615.A559@best.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.05+ on Emacs 19.34.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 1999 10:05:22 +0100
Message-ID: <21711.919587922@verdi.nethelp.no>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> > So why are rpc.statd and portmap started by default in FreeBSD?
> 
> 	AFAIK only portmap is started. Not rpc.statd - but I do
> 	agree with you that portmap should not be started by
> 	default. Jordan - your call?

$Id: rc.conf,v 1.83 1999/02/09 04:17:45 dillon Exp $
...
rpc_statd_enable="YES"		# Run NFS rpc.statd if nfs_server (or NO).
portmap_enable="YES"		# Run the portmapper service (or NO).

AFAIK starting those have been the defaults for at least a couple of years.

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message