From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 9 20:50:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 164D416A4EA; Mon, 9 May 2005 20:50:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 21322530218.direct.eti.at (21322530218.direct.eti.at [213.225.30.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE96D43D31; Mon, 9 May 2005 20:50:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tilman@arved.at) Received: from jim.arved.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])j49Kmn8s060455; Mon, 9 May 2005 22:48:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tilman@arved.at) Received: (from arved@localhost) by jim.arved.de (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j49KmmP1060454; Mon, 9 May 2005 22:48:48 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tilman@arved.at) X-Authentication-Warning: jim.arved.de: arved set sender to tilman@arved.at using -f Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 22:48:48 +0200 From: Tilman Linneweh To: Kevin Oberman Message-ID: <20050509204848.GN2894@arved.at> References: <200505082028.j48KSlwF053917@freefall.freebsd.org> <20050509194751.4A3BF5D08@ptavv.es.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050509194751.4A3BF5D08@ptavv.es.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/80711: misc/most: most-4.10.1 can not search X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 20:50:12 -0000 * Kevin Oberman [2005-05-09 21:48]: > I sort of found the problem. > > >From configure: > if test "$ac_test_CFLAGS" = set; then > CFLAGS=$ac_save_CFLAGS > elif test $ac_cv_prog_cc_g = yes; then > if test "$GCC" = yes; then > CFLAGS="-g -O2" > else > CFLAGS="-g" > fi > else > if test "$GCC" = yes; then > CFLAGS="-O2" > else > CFLAGS= > fi > fi This is the normal configure script. The CFLAGS are set by the ports framework, so this should not be a problem. > It REALLY wants to build with -O2, but -O2 produces the failures. If I > compile without the -O2, it works fine. > > How are you compiling? I am compiling with -O, because there are too many ports that just don't work with -O2 But i just tried it with -O2 and this one still works... Anyway, I disabled building with -O2 in the port... regards tilman