From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Mar  2 17:52:38 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B259A9B9;
 Sat,  2 Mar 2013 17:52:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9978F9FF;
 Sat,  2 Mar 2013 17:52:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua
 [212.40.38.100])
 by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id TAA21821;
 Sat, 02 Mar 2013 19:52:36 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
 by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD))
 id 1UBqbr-000Avp-KX; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 19:52:35 +0200
Message-ID: <51323C62.4040506@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2013 19:52:34 +0200
From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130220 Thunderbird/17.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: clang generated code sometimes confuses fbt
References: <5132387E.8010808@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <5132387E.8010808@FreeBSD.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=x-viet-vps
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2013 17:52:38 -0000

on 02/03/2013 19:35 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> Now, I am not quite sure why ctfconvert skips bpobj_iterate_impl in the
> clang-generated code.  Seems like some sort of a bug in ctfconvert.

It seems that gcc and clang put different names for symbol of type FILE:
clang:
readelf -a -W /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/TRANT/bpobj.o| fgrep -w FILE
     1: 0000000000000000     0 FILE    LOCAL  DEFAULT  ABS
/usr/src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/bpobj.c

gcc:
readelf -a -W /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ODYSSEY/bpobj.o| fgrep -w FILE
     1: 0000000000000000     0 FILE    LOCAL  DEFAULT  ABS bpobj.c

ctfconvert seems to compare this value with "bpobj.c" and so in the clang case
it doesn't recognize the static symbols.

Does my analysis seem reasonable?
-- 
Andriy Gapon