From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Jun 10 15:13:59 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA04034 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 15:13:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from implode.root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA04007 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 15:13:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from root@implode.root.com) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA13576; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 15:11:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199806102211.PAA13576@implode.root.com> To: Bruce Grisham cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Help !! Intel Pro/100B crawls. I've GOT to get this fixed !! In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 10 Jun 1998 15:48:59 EDT." <357EE32A.7EA2FE07@accumatics.com> From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 15:11:52 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >I'm trying to use the Intel Pro/100B adapter (intel part pila8465b, >82557 chipset). > >It's recognized correctly by the kernel, and my networking is set up >properly from rc.conf. > >The symptom is absolute crawl for a few thousand bytes, then zero. >(Interestingly, the same behavior as when I tried a Pro/100+ for the >hell of it. It also was recognized as a Pro/100B.) > >But back to THIS adapter, ifconfig shows the interface up and running. >Prods such as specifying the media instead of letting it autoselect >didn't help. > >I stubbornly want to use this adapter because its interface appears to >be (potentially) more efficient than than de0 and I have specified it on >two high-end systems I'm building. This sounds like an interrupt conflict of some kind. What does 'dmesg' show is the interrupt assigned to the card? -DG David Greenman Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message