From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Sep  9 00:26:59 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66631106567A
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri,  9 Sep 2011 00:26:59 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jhs@berklix.com)
Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC90F8FC0A
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri,  9 Sep 2011 00:26:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p5DCBE12D.dip.t-dialin.net [93.203.225.45])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p890Quld017917
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 00:26:57 GMT
	(envelope-from jhs@berklix.com)
Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41])
	by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p890QjTf072038
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 02:26:45 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from jhs@berklix.com)
Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p890Qd9F078945
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 00:26:45 GMT
	(envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net)
Message-Id: <201109090026.p890Qd9F078945@fire.js.berklix.net>
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com>
Organization: http://www.berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany
User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://www.berklix.com/free/
X-URL: http://www.berklix.com
In-reply-to: Your message "Thu, 08 Sep 2011 18:54:36 +0200."
	<4E68F34C.6090504@FreeBSD.org> 
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 02:26:39 +0200
Sender: jhs@berklix.com
Subject: Re: sysutils/cfs 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 00:26:59 -0000

Matthias Andree wrote:

> Am 08.09.2011 13:52, schrieb Matt Burke:

> > I want machines, tools, to do as *I* say not the other way round, whether
> > it's good for me or not. If I wanted nannying and interference, I'd install
> > Ubuntu.
> 
> No, you'd use a managed installation.  Nobody stands there pointing a
> gun at your head and forces you to uninstall a port that got removed
> from the ports/ tree.  If people could recognize that, it might help get
> the derailed discussion back on the right track.

Recent butchery degrading ports/ has been unprofessional.  Denying
users are best to decide for themselves in light of their own circustance,
is not acceptable.  FreeBSD is for skilled Users not the clueless.
Commit bit[s] should be revoked before FreeBSD incures more damage.

Cheers,
Julian
-- 
Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com
 Reply below, not above;  Indent with "> ";  Cumulative like a play script.
 Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable.
 http://www.softwarefreedomday.org 17th Sept,  http://berklix.org/sfd/ Oct.