Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:58:34 -0700
From:      "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" <chad@shire.net>
To:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG ORG <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: AMD vs Intel ...
Message-ID:  <BE4EE848-5BF2-11D8-889B-003065A70D30@shire.net>
In-Reply-To: <4028CDA5.3010904@mac.com>
References:  <20040209121420.G13061@ganymede.hub.org> <59D53984-5B26-11D8-8AE0-003065ABFD92@mac.com> <20040209141200.K13061@ganymede.hub.org> <45C0AC64-5B31-11D8-8AE0-003065ABFD92@mac.com> <20040210042518.GA53510@wiz.com> <4028CDA5.3010904@mac.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Feb 10, 2004, at 5:25 AM, Chuck Swiger wrote:

> Marc Wiz wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 01:53:38PM -0500, Charles Swiger wrote:
>>> OK.  The price difference for AMD vs. Intel is pretty significant, 
>>> but be aware that you'll also pay a significant premium for 
>>> dual-proc hardware versus single-proc machines: compare an AMD 
>>> 2400MP versus the 2400XP price, or the 2.4GHz Xeon P4 vs. a 
>>> Northwood P4, and then factor in the additional costs for a 
>>> MP-capable motherboard.
>> Try about $159 for a dual processor motherboard from Tyan.
>> I just bought a S2466 for about that much brand new.
>
> You can get a decent single-proc AMD motherboard for about $55 
> (Shuttle AK39N w/ VIA KT400 + VT8235, onboard LAN and audio), which is 
> one third the cost of your dual-proc MB, although obviously one can 
> spend more on either type.
>

Just a note:  If you want ECC with an AMD Athlon (not AMD64), you need 
to buy a dual board anyway, since I don't know of anyone who makes a 
board with a chipset that supports ECC that isn't a dual.

Chad



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BE4EE848-5BF2-11D8-889B-003065A70D30>