Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 12:34:44 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 220355] dns/knot2: Use GCC on i386, Remove BROKEN on i386 Message-ID: <bug-220355-13-5lzMj8qlnT@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-220355-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-220355-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D220355 Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |maintainer-feedback?(freebs | |d@dns-lab.com) Keywords| |needs-qa CC| |freebsd@dns-lab.com Summary|[MAINTAINER-UPDATE] |dns/knot2: Use GCC on i386, |dns/knot2: unbroken at i386 |Remove BROKEN on i386 Status|New |Open URL| |https://lists.nic.cz/piperm | |ail/knot-dns-users/2017-Jun | |e/001156.html --- Comment #1 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> --- Thank you Leo. I don't believe it is accepted to use CC=3Dclang (hardcoded, rather than framework mechanisms such as USES=3Dcompiler et al). Additionally, why is HAS_CONFIGURE used in the !i386 case instead of GNU_CONFIGURE (in all cases) Also, for this and future issues, please separate out logically distinct changes, in this case combining CONFLICTS->CONFLICTS_INSTALL with changes required to only fix BROKEN --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-220355-13-5lzMj8qlnT>