From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Oct 26 19:49:27 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from smtp2.vnet.net (smtp2.vnet.net [166.82.1.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAC1814D0F for ; Tue, 26 Oct 1999 19:49:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rivers@dignus.com) Received: from dignus.com (ponds.vnet.net [166.82.177.48]) by smtp2.vnet.net (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA27423; Tue, 26 Oct 1999 22:49:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lakes.dignus.com (lakes.dignus.com [10.0.0.3]) by dignus.com (8.9.2/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA49271; Tue, 26 Oct 1999 22:49:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes.dignus.com (8.9.3/8.6.9) id WAA32016; Tue, 26 Oct 1999 22:49:05 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 22:49:05 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas David Rivers Message-Id: <199910270249.WAA32016@lakes.dignus.com> To: chuckr@picnic.mat.net, rivers@dignus.com Subject: Re: X11/C++ question Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Then you just stick a C wrapper function around every C++ callback you > want to register, is that it? Seems a bit inelegant, but I suppose, if > the ultimate test of elegance is that "it's the only one that works", then > it's perhaps elegant *enough*. I believe someone posted a better solution... from the Xt FAQ. - Dave R. - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message