From owner-freebsd-questions Tue May 8 18:28:28 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from nisser.com (c0039.upc-c.chello.nl [212.187.0.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A90E337B423 for ; Tue, 8 May 2001 18:28:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from roelof@eboa.com) Received: from eboa.com (roelof [10.0.0.2]) by nisser.com (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id DAA56407; Wed, 9 May 2001 03:27:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from roelof@eboa.com) Message-ID: <3AF89D04.11DA450F@eboa.com> Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 03:27:32 +0200 From: Roelof Osinga Organization: eBOA - Programming the Web X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ted Mittelstaedt Cc: Kris Kennaway , Doug Young , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Query on SSL / SSLeay References: <002801c0d67b$c22e2760$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > ... > Originally, before OpenSSL, if you wanted SSL on Webmin > you installed SSLeay-0.9.0b.tar.gz and the Perl interface > to it, Net_SSLeay.pm-1.03.tar.gz. The problem here was that > SSLeay needed the copyrighted RSA libes, and it was defined as > a munition (rather silly) preventing export and some more > silly nonsense. The way I remember it is that in that time on the SSLeay mailing list was announced that SSLeay was to be superceded by OpenSSL. Which was in fact an outgrowth of SSLeay. Legalities did play some role. But wasn't SSLeay non-US, Aussie I recall, therefore not bound by any RSA patents? That was quite some time ago, though. Roelof -- _______________________________________________________________________ eBOAź est. 1982 http://eBOA.com/ tel. +31-58-2123014 mailto:info@eBOA.com?subject=Information_request fax. +31-58-2160293 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message