From owner-freebsd-security Sat Mar 4 10:30: 7 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F0937B594 for ; Sat, 4 Mar 2000 10:29:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA18582; Sat, 4 Mar 2000 11:00:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2000 11:00:55 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Mike Tancsa Cc: Jonathan Fortin , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: work around for local DoS ? (kern 17152) Message-ID: <20000304110055.B14279@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <4.2.2.20000304114458.03c48b48@mail.sentex.net> <4.2.2.20000304122608.03c1cb08@mail.sentex.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <4.2.2.20000304122608.03c1cb08@mail.sentex.net>; from mike@sentex.net on Sat, Mar 04, 2000 at 12:27:16PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * Mike Tancsa [000304 10:01] wrote: > At 12:21 PM 3/4/2000 -0500, Jonathan Fortin wrote: > >ulimit > > In what way? The bug does not appear to be a resource issue patch your kernel to make all aio calls return ENOSYS. If it hasn't been backported in a bit I think i'll take a look at having it disabled in -stable by default. -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message