From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 24 01:07:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 383F81065676 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:07:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F01868FC17; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:07:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4887D5E1.9080903@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:07:45 +0200 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: twhoffma@student.matnat.uio.no References: <48764.80.202.85.78.1216849881.squirrel@webmail.uio.no> <4887AFD4.9000106@FreeBSD.org> <49448.80.202.85.78.1216861022.squirrel@webmail.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <49448.80.202.85.78.1216861022.squirrel@webmail.uio.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing jdk on 7-Release: Has known vulnerabilities from 2005? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:07:47 -0000 Torgeir Hoffmann wrote: > Hi again! > >>> when I try to install linux-sun-jdk16 from ports I get: >>> >>> ===> linux-sun-jdk-1.6.0.07 has known vulnerabilities: >>> => jdk -- jar directory traversal vulnerability. >>> Reference: >>> >>> => Please update your ports tree and try again. >>> *** Error code 1 >>> >>> This refers to a vulnerability from 2005 (!). I get the same thing with >>> the 1.5 port. >>> I desperately want to avoid building the native version due to the fact >>> that I have a not that sporty laptop, and the packages from the freebsd >>> foundation is not available yet. >>> >>> I have the latest portsnap port snapshot. >> Update your portaudit database. > > I did that. > > portaudit -Fda > > Still, same thing. Thought this was very strange as well. > > Anything else that I should have done? (It's probably right in front of me!) Talk to the port maintainer if you think the vulnerability no longer exists, or build with DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES if you choose to override the warning. Kris