Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 19:35:13 +0300 From: Yuri Pankov <yuripv@yuripv.net> To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net>, =?UTF-8?Q?Trond_Endrest=c3=b8l?= <Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no> Cc: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org>, Michael Butler <imb@protected-networks.net>, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: kernel build failure Message-ID: <65768f5e-2228-3abb-9f99-8398ceab6911@yuripv.net> In-Reply-To: <201808131628.w7DGSvOm037857@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> References: <201808131628.w7DGSvOm037857@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Rodney W. Grimes wrote: >> On Sun, 12 Aug 2018 14:39-0700, Matthew Macy wrote: >> >>> Sorry guys, last time I touched ZFS I tried to push to make it an option to >>> statically link and was actually told that it wasn't something anyone else >>> wanted. The issue comes from ZFS not being in NOTES and thus not in LINT. >> >> If consensus is that "options ZFS" is no longer valid, then maybe >> UPDATING should reflect the fact. >> >> I can live with loading zfs.ko and opensolaris.ko at boot time, but I >> think this is a step backwards. > > Please no, I can think of no sound reason that you should be > forced to use modules. Isn't it already fixed in r337690?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?65768f5e-2228-3abb-9f99-8398ceab6911>