From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Sep 9 01:48:07 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id BAA08995 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 9 Sep 1996 01:48:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alpo.whistle.com (s205m1.whistle.com [207.76.205.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA08990 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 1996 01:48:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from current1.whistle.com (current1.whistle.com [207.76.205.22]) by alpo.whistle.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id BAA01373; Mon, 9 Sep 1996 01:38:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3233D739.52BFA1D7@whistle.com> Date: Mon, 09 Sep 1996 01:37:13 -0700 From: Julian Elischer Organization: Whistle Communications X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0b6 (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2-CURRENT i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl CC: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Sig 11 page Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk You should also mention in your page that the FreeBSD group has isolated the EXACT same phenomenon, and that under FreeBSD compiling a kernel (or doing "make world" which is even more gruelling) is more stressfull on ram that any simm tester. sig-10 and sig-11 in these circumstances are nearly always found to be bad hardware as on linux.. If you add this comment I think we would add a link to you rpage from the FreeBSD web page as well, it'd shut up all those "My friend says it's The OS and I should switch to " comments.. It's also a well written and good page to reference. julian Re: http://www.bitwizard.nl/sig11/