From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 7 13:01:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32DB116A41C for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2005 13:01:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ducrot@poupinou.org) Received: from poup.poupinou.org (poup.poupinou.org [195.101.94.96]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB7143D48 for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2005 13:01:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ducrot@poupinou.org) Received: from ducrot by poup.poupinou.org with local (Exim) id 1DqVzu-0003Yl-00; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 15:00:58 +0200 Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 15:00:58 +0200 To: Rainer Duffner Message-ID: <20050707130058.GE12594@poupinou.org> References: <200507071157.j67BvInp068222@lurza.secnetix.de> <42CD2485.3010703@ultra-secure.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42CD2485.3010703@ultra-secure.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Bruno Ducrot Cc: freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Samsung X20-XVM 1600-V X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 13:01:09 -0000 On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 02:48:05PM +0200, Rainer Duffner wrote: > Does OpenBSD have no ACPI-support at all by default? There are now some ACPI stuff under OpenBSD current, but it's very primitive right now and I think they use only the 'C' (Configuration), not 'P' (Power Management). > I even tried Solaris10 on it ;-) Solaris use a decent STR and STD implementation when I read OpenSolaris, but I never tested. -- Bruno Ducrot -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care.