Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 15:30:11 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 265857] qlnxe: no IPV6 pings between nodes on the same switch until an IPv4 address is set Message-ID: <bug-265857-7501-U4IBHGBAgm@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-265857-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-265857-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D265857 --- Comment #20 from Zhenlei Huang <zlei.huang@gmail.com> --- (In reply to benoitc from comment #17) > A, B, C , D can ping each others using the local link IP `fe080::....` Why I got confused is that the attachment shows that ping from node2 to nod= e1 with link-local address fails . > A, B, C can ping D on <PREFIX>::10, and D can ping A, B, C on their <PREF= IX> . This looks like port isolation is tuned on, and A, B, C are in private VLAN. Do you have physical access to the environment? Can you please exchange the switch port of A with that of D ? Then the setup looks like this: |- ::10 machine D |- ::12 machine B SWITCH --|- ::13 machine C | |- ::11 machine A Then ping global IPv6 address from B to D, and B to A . > Using Linux this is working perfectly and th eissue is not reproduced. Do you mean that with same switch and machines, but A, B and C boot into Li= nux ? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-265857-7501-U4IBHGBAgm>