From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Aug 10 19:49:58 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B14DD37B400 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 19:49:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rdu57-17-158.nc.rr.com [66.57.17.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E701043E3B for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 19:49:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from shumai.marcuscom.com (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) by creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7B2msEF059591; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 22:48:54 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Subject: Re: fxp problems with latest stable Re: panics after upgrading to -STABLE Aug 9, 2002 (still something up) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Mike Tancsa Cc: David Wolfskill , stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20020810223857.06868830@192.168.0.12> References: <20020811014225.GC92924@gruntle.org> <5.1.0.14.0.20020810223857.06868830@192.168.0.12> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-gVAPS8LeUR4oXJIzySRe" X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 10 Aug 2002 22:50:21 -0400 Message-Id: <1029034221.61373.34.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --=-gVAPS8LeUR4oXJIzySRe Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2002-08-10 at 22:44, Mike Tancsa wrote: >=20 > Yes, I do not get those reproducible panics either. However, I think thi= s=20 > fxp problem I am seeing now is something different. I was seeing the same thing, but it seems to go away after the new machine transmits a certain amount of data. That is, my NFS server isn't exhibiting the problem, but my GNOME 2.0 build machine was until I sent enough pings from it. Now, I can't get packet loss in any direction. Joe >=20 > ---Mike >=20 > At 07:36 PM 8/10/2002 -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > > >Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 18:42:25 -0700 > > >From: cj_ > > > > >Can someone confirm when the -STABLE kernel is usable? I lack a > > >throwaway machine to test this out on. > > > >I was able to get a dead-on reproducible panic, even with sources > >CVSupped as of 0347 hrs. PST (GMT-7) today. After hand-applying the > >patch in > >http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=3D2013026+0+current/cvs-all > >(which refers to PR kern/41492), I no longer get that (or any other, so > >far) panic. > > > >Cheers, > >david (links to my resume at http://www.catwhisker.org/~david) > >-- > >David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org > >To paraphrase David Hilbert, there can be no conflicts between Microsoft > >and the discipline of systems administration, since they have nothing in > >common. > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message >=20 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 > Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net > Providing Internet since 1994 www.sentex.net > Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike >=20 >=20 > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message >=20 --=-gVAPS8LeUR4oXJIzySRe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA9VdDtb2iPiv4Uz4cRAmoyAKCviWBTL6Y3mpOcc2NxGfYYDQgHkwCaA932 OWhnXEHqVZ9Ygv/uQ1wh8aw= =4yFU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-gVAPS8LeUR4oXJIzySRe-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message