From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 10:47:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03D641065675 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 10:47:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from raven.customer.vol.cz (raven.customer.vol.cz [195.250.144.108]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 844868FC16 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 10:46:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pav.hide.vol.cz (nat-application.b1.lan.prg.vol.cz [195.122.204.152]) (authenticated bits=0) by raven.customer.vol.cz (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oB3Akpou025853 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 3 Dec 2010 11:46:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4CF8CA9B.5050109@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 11:46:51 +0100 From: Pav Lucistnik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101124 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexey Dokuchaev References: <201012030443.oB34hNLo042059@repoman.freebsd.org> <4CF8AB2D.8060201@FreeBSD.org> <20101203093851.GA59399@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20101203093851.GA59399@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 195.250.144.108 X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: raven.customer.vol.cz; Sender-ip: 195.122.204.152; Sender-helo: pav.hide.vol.cz; ) Cc: Mikhail Teterin , cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/gdb66 Makefile ports/devel/gdb66/files itcl33-patch X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 10:47:00 -0000 On 2010/12/03 10:38, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 09:32:45AM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: >> OPTIONS= [..] >> .include >> .if (WITH_FOO) >> USE_TK= [..] >> .endif >> >> .include >> do-[..] >> .include > > I think in most (simple) cases separate includes for .pre/.port parts > is unnecessary, no?: > > OPTIONS= [...] > .include > > .include Correct, if you don't need post-premk declarations you can just replace pre.mk with options.mk -- Pav Lucistnik