Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 11 Jul 2003 07:21:16 +1000 (EST)
From:      Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
To:        Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD current users <current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: small scheduler hack/patch
Message-ID:  <20030711070631.C27297@gamplex.bde.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0307101056420.40558-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0307101056420.40558-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Julian Elischer wrote:

> I have a small "proof of concept" scheduler hack at:
> http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/it.diff
> ...
> It's only implemented for SMP/i386 as the code to halt the cpu is only
> present (from my quick view) in x86 and it doesn't make sense in UP..

ipi_selected() is essentially MI although it is declared in
<machine/smp.h> and takes MD arg types, since it is used in subr_smp.c
and subr_smp.c is MI by definition.  Its second arg is u_int64_t on
alphas, int on ia64's, and u_int on other arches.  This isn't a problem
since the arg is always a #define'd value like IPI_AST and these values
have MD definitions.  Its first arg has type u_int64_t on ia64's and
u_int on other arches.  This is bogus for ia64's since subr_smp.c uses
u_int for all bitmaps of CPUs, so systems with more than 32 CPUs cannot
actually work.

Bruce



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030711070631.C27297>