Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 10 Aug 2010 12:18:06 +0300
From:      Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
To:        Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: tiny sys/sys/signal.h cleanup
Message-ID:  <20100810091806.GC2396@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
In-Reply-To: <20100810015347.GA17233@freebsd.org>
References:  <20100810015347.GA17233@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--UPT3ojh+0CqEDtpF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 01:53:47AM +0000, Alexander Best wrote:
> hi there,
>=20
> just wanted to get some feedback for this tiny patch and if people think =
it
> makes sense.

I almost agree with the part of the patch that removes excessive commenting
for the individual signals. But I do not see much sense in repeating the
text that would be better suited for the man page, like signal(3).

--UPT3ojh+0CqEDtpF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkxhGU4ACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4gOGgCdF6xXX9/G9kUEaddBeDCsvhAS
ol4AnAtpjOn9pf2dRSYT5SWwVUlhFYn5
=YjR3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--UPT3ojh+0CqEDtpF--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100810091806.GC2396>