Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 12:18:06 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tiny sys/sys/signal.h cleanup Message-ID: <20100810091806.GC2396@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <20100810015347.GA17233@freebsd.org> References: <20100810015347.GA17233@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--UPT3ojh+0CqEDtpF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 01:53:47AM +0000, Alexander Best wrote: > hi there, >=20 > just wanted to get some feedback for this tiny patch and if people think = it > makes sense. I almost agree with the part of the patch that removes excessive commenting for the individual signals. But I do not see much sense in repeating the text that would be better suited for the man page, like signal(3). --UPT3ojh+0CqEDtpF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkxhGU4ACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4gOGgCdF6xXX9/G9kUEaddBeDCsvhAS ol4AnAtpjOn9pf2dRSYT5SWwVUlhFYn5 =YjR3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UPT3ojh+0CqEDtpF--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100810091806.GC2396>