Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 19:52:30 +0100 From: Paul Richards <paul@originative.co.uk> To: Colin Percival <cperciva@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/ed Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/cvs/cvs Makefile src/kerberos5 Makefile.inc src/lib/libfetch Makefile Makefile src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_ksu Makefile ... Message-ID: <1091818349.17455.2.camel@myrddin> In-Reply-To: <200408060727.i767R87w004556@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200408060727.i767R87w004556@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 08:27, Colin Percival wrote: > Join the 21st century: Cryptography is no longer an optional component > of releases. The -DNOCRYPT build option still exists for anyone who > really wants to build non-cryptographic binaries, but the "crypto" > release distribution is now part of "base", and anyone installing from a > release will get cryptographic binaries. > > Approved by: re (scottl), markm > Discussed on: freebsd-current, in late April 2004 This might not be as dead an issue as people think. From information I've received recently it seems that exporting crypto from the UK now requires an export license. Paul.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1091818349.17455.2.camel>