Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 20:05:32 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 265857] qlnxe: no IPV6 pings between nodes on the same switch until an IPv4 address is set Message-ID: <bug-265857-7501-nlcNTkMkE1@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-265857-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-265857-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D265857 --- Comment #21 from benoitc <benoitc@enki-multimedia.eu> --- (In reply to Zhenlei Huang from comment #20) > Why I got confused is that the attachment shows that ping from node2 to n= ode1 with link-local address fails . I tested after reboot without mtu set and it worked. Which is weird indeed. > This looks like port isolation is tuned on, and A, B, C are in private VL= AN. >=20 > Do you have physical access to the environment? Can you please exchange t= he switch > port of A with that of D ? Then the setup looks like this: >=20 > |- ::10 machine D > |- ::12 machine B > SWITCH --|- ::13 machine C > | > |- ::11 machine A >=20 > Then ping global IPv6 address from B to D, and B to A . I did it just to be sure, but this didn't change anything. I also checked on the switch and no port isolation is set. > > Using Linux this is working perfectly and th eissue is not reproduced. > > Do you mean that with same switch and machines, but A, B and C boot into = Linux ? yes exactly. Under linux it works like a charm... --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-265857-7501-nlcNTkMkE1>