From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Apr 15 04:03:21 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id EAA02727
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 15 Apr 1997 04:03:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.dk.tfs.com ([140.145.230.252])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA02716;
          Tue, 15 Apr 1997 04:02:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.dk.tfs.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA00538;
	Tue, 15 Apr 1997 13:01:20 +0200 (CEST)
To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch)
cc: current@FreeBSD.org
From: phk@dk.tfs.com
Subject: Re: ISODEVMAP in cd9660 ? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 14 Apr 1997 20:48:51 +0200."
             <19970414204851.XX16922@uriah.heep.sax.de> 
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 13:01:20 +0200
Message-ID: <536.861102080@critter>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <19970414204851.XX16922@uriah.heep.sax.de>, J Wunsch writes:
>As phk@dk.tfs.com wrote:
>
>> Anybody know  a good reason for not nuking the "ISODEVMAP" stuff in cd9660 ?
>
>Does anybody realize what's the intention behind all this?

No idea really, and since DEVFS will make it pointless and it wasn't
documented I've nuked it.

--
Poul-Henning Kamp           | phk@FreeBSD.ORG       FreeBSD Core-team.
http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk    Private mailbox.
whois: [PHK]                | phk@tfs.com           TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
Power and ignorance is a disgusting cocktail.