From owner-cvs-all Tue Jan 22 21:55: 6 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan.algebra.com [216.254.65.224]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C848037B435; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 21:54:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.11.6/8.11.5) with ESMTP id g0N5olQ68252; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 00:50:48 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) Message-Id: <200201230550.g0N5olQ68252@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 00:50:44 -0500 (EST) From: Mikhail Teterin Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/ufs/ffs ffs_alloc.c ffs_extern.h ffs_softdep.c To: rb@gid.co.uk Cc: des@ofug.org, benno@jeamland.net, mckusick@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20020122123203.00c25100@gid.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 22 Jan, Bob Bishop wrote: > At 13:26 22/01/02 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: >>Benno Rice writes: >> > This change breaks kernels without softupdates. >> >>Why do we even bother supporting that? > PicoBSD and the like, for a start... BTW, would it be good for some situations to have the read-only kernel? I'd imagine, the writing functionality takes plenty of room, so some embedded situations can benefit greatly. You make the filesystems outside of the device and place the -- presumably much smaller -- RO kernel on it... -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message