Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 18:52:22 +0400 (MSK) From: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: ports/187085: [PATCH] devel/libexecinfo: possibly conflicts with systemwide libexecinfo on 10.x Message-ID: <20140226145222.1ADEB187CE@hades.panopticon> Resent-Message-ID: <201402261500.s1QF01Ha072293@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 187085 >Category: ports >Synopsis: [PATCH] devel/libexecinfo: possibly conflicts with systemwide libexecinfo on 10.x >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: change-request >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Wed Feb 26 15:00:01 UTC 2014 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Dmitry Marakasov >Release: FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE amd64 >Organization: >Environment: System: FreeBSD hades.panopticon 10.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE #0 r260807: Fri Jan 17 13:14:28 MSK >Description: On 10.x, there is /usr/lib/libexecinfo.so. I'm not sure whether it does the same as libexecinfo from ports and is compatible with it, but if it is, it probably should be handled like iconv is: there should be USES for it which only installs port on FreeBSD versions which do not have bundled libexecinfo. Otherwise it should also be handled specially so system library is not linked instead of one from ports. Related: ports/187084 Port maintainer (itetcu@FreeBSD.org) is cc'd. Generated with FreeBSD Port Tools 1.00.2014.02.18 (mode: change, diff: ports) >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140226145222.1ADEB187CE>