From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 2 20:32:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CC2C1065672; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 20:32:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 356EF8FC14; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 20:32:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkvi18 with SMTP id i18so3516002bkv.13 for ; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 13:32:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=2/3ODHTnLPEcFPewC6zr0Y3Xi9JViuQJpjwP1IICAZI=; b=XS8QR4tUGEiVo++WfQb4azKPfdMjai5ZyAlW1FrRbl5SJidOt2G+6Hw0GFogVri1k8 fB366J5tDy+fPyFunX8PIEw97I1FjUl5Su6ZhaTs7+kh9Nw8trFAwlAbY/bg6QzZh4DJ YI2Ft1KDX3a048SxpY58HvK7B76nu2qxe0uTeojBo5LAEP/E+oEYs8V38lVx63uvZEwY sARuhb6zxogrg2U3g7pcYbXbfgotjclPM/awNa0TWO9RZEVkBETFjfDD3C0Tjwi6VtMr 33iL6DE1gDcLUXk04DSeeGavYNl92FhuyiFDRmioq9XbnMM35fK9e7maXOoNvX2YAfD+ ullw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.152.196 with SMTP id h4mr4084417bkw.131.1338669169227; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 13:32:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.171.138 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 13:32:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.171.138 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 13:32:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FCA7790.4040604@acsalaska.net> References: <4301C0E3-3C53-46E2-B5A5-7BD120CD775F@FreeBSD.org> <4FCA0DA6.7070502@acsalaska.net> <4FCA7790.4040604@acsalaska.net> Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 21:32:49 +0100 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: Mel Flynn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Baptiste Daroussin , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] New framework options aka optionng X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 20:32:51 -0000 On Jun 2, 2012 9:29 PM, "Mel Flynn" wrote: > > On 2-6-2012 15:24, Chris Rees wrote: > > On Jun 2, 2012 1:57 PM, "Mel Flynn" wrote: > >> > >> On 12-5-2012 5:41, Erwin Lansing wrote: > >> > >>> All the details has been documented and written down on the wiki: > >>> http://wiki.freebsd.org/Ports/Options/OptionsNG > >> > >> Sorry to jump in late, but it just occurred to me that I have a valid > >> case for "zero or 1" multi options or implemented slightly different, a > >> case for "if single is on, multigroup needs one, else multigroup must be > > 0" > >> The specific case is this: > >> - User can opt to force runtime dependency on a web server by selecting > >> one of 4 or none. > >> > > > > Just put a dummy option NOWEBSERVER or something in the singlegroup. > > I'll think I'll go for "NONE" to avoid NO/WITHOUT namespaces. NONEwhat? Chris