Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 26 Mar 2012 07:07:47 -0700
From:      Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org>
To:        freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: wi diff
Message-ID:  <4F707833.8080107@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <CA%2BWntOtwEpaoUyC8xTu4Cw2-hSCb10sCPrPxJYZ0eU5Wo9wppA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CA%2BWntOtovGHo1wPzJQ5bf4-xrtcMzdXhnWSiBxH7vUp%2B_1-zJw@mail.gmail.com> <20120324172025.67615299@narn.knownspace> <CA%2BWntOtwEpaoUyC8xTu4Cw2-hSCb10sCPrPxJYZ0eU5Wo9wppA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03/25/12 19:39, Super Bisquit wrote:
> On 3/24/12, Justin Hibbits<chmeeedalf@gmail.com>  wrote:
>> On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 17:04:58 -0400
>> Super Bisquit<superbisquit@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>
>>> I sent two emails- the second a repeat of the first.
>>> In GENERIC,  all warnings were edited out and wi was not added in the
>>> miibus section.
>>> I haven't rebooted yet. The other messages show the error.
>>>
>>> Apologies for the sudden come and go.
>>>
>>> Justin, thanks for the reply in CURRENT. I think that clang, llvm, and
>>> related need to be in the base and not in ports. Developer version
>>> releases are different. Look on emulation for some posts I made, is
>>> it possible to get what was sent- I think from you if I recall
>>> correctly- to be in source?
>>>
>>> If it wasn't for the error, buildworld on powerpc with clang would
>>> have worked.
>>>
>>> Garrett, has the error from tinderbox build been corrected and has a
>>> build been setup with clang instead?
>>
>>  From my understanding, wi(4) does not attach to the mii bus, so you
>> will never see it.  If my understanding is correct, mii is for physical
>> ethernet only (a real networking expert can correct me here, gladly).
>> So the attachment you see of wi(4) should only be on the macio, pci, or
>> pccard buses, if in fact you have a wi(4) card (original airport,
>> not airport extreme in the case of my diff).
>>
>> As for the clang/llvm problems, since clang is not complete regarding
>> powerpc (and anything but x86/x86-64 and most of arm), it doesn't make
>> sense to keep updating them just to track any possible PowerPC
>> changes.  One very important part that's missing in the PowerPC target
>> is position-independent code, which is required for shared libraries.
>> I've been working off and on with getting Thread-local storage working
>> for PowerPC, but have not done too much (wrote the basic function,
>> haven't added the codegen parts in), but will continue working on it
>> over the coming months, and then turn my attention to PIC (if nobody
>> else has stepped up to it by then).  With these being the two biggest
>> stumbling points, solving them will go a long way to getting clang
>> buildworlding FreeBSD.
>>
>> - Justin
>>
>
> I emailed the Debian maintainers for clang and asked about configure
> options. Although it is not FreeBSD, the information may help some.
> The #llvm irc channel mentioned that FreeBSD was/is interested in
> PowerPC builds.
>

You need to add -fno-strict-aliasing when building straight from SVN, at 
which point everything works fine. You can see how it's done in the 
FreeBSD tree.
-Nathan



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F707833.8080107>