Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 15 Jan 2001 16:00:36 +0200
From:      "Dave Wilson" <davew@sai.co.za>
To:        "Matthew Horoschun" <matthew@actweb.net>
Cc:        <freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   RE: DNS redundancy & load balancing
Message-ID:  <NEBBJFIIGKGLPEBIJACLEEJHCMAA.davew@sai.co.za>
In-Reply-To: <3A63E62D.1E7D15AB@actweb.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Matthew,

Thanks for getting back to me.
Yea our NAS assigns our clients both DNS.... unfortunately many of our
clients are still using Win '95.

Kindest regards
David Wilson
The S.A Internet




#include <std-disclaimer.h>

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Horoschun [mailto:matthew@actweb.net]
Sent: 16 January 2001 08:12
To: Dave Wilson
Subject: Re: DNS redundancy & load balancing




Dave Wilson wrote:

> Hi Matthew,
>
> Indeed but clients have their primary DNS server set to our primary, thus
if
> our primary goes down no resolution takes place.
> Clients have a their seconday DNS set to our secondary DNS, but we've
found
> that often M$ machines never even try looking at their secondary DNS
server.
> Any ideas ?

Dave,

Do your access servers allocate your customers with Name server IP's on
connection? Are you specifying both there?

I've seen the same thing in the past... although I have a feeling it was a
bug
that M$ fixed by about the time 'doze98 came out?... i.e. in DUN1.2?

Matthew.




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?NEBBJFIIGKGLPEBIJACLEEJHCMAA.davew>