From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 22 23:26:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67FE016A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 23:26:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mizar.origin-it.net (mizar.origin-it.net [194.8.96.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C94D643D48 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 23:26:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Helge.Oldach@atosorigin.com) Received: from matar.hbg.de.int.atosorigin.com (dehsfw3e.origin-it.net [194.8.96.68])i5MNQaMC051589 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 23 Jun 2004 01:26:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Helge.Oldach@atosorigin.com) Received: from dehhx004.hbg.de.int.atosorigin.com (dehhx004.hbg.de.int.atosorigin.com [161.90.164.40]) ESMTP id i5MNQaNv089737; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 01:26:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Helge.Oldach@atosorigin.com) Received: by dehhx004.hbg.de.int.atosorigin.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 01:26:36 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Oldach, Helge" To: "'Bjoern Koenig'" , "'Allan Fields'" Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 01:26:35 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: nullfs in 4.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 23:26:45 -0000 > From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Bjoern Koenig > > NFS on localhost instead of nullfs is a very > good solution. Err, no, the overhead is *much* higher than plain nullfs or unionfs. Local NFS is essentially fiddling file system access through the networking subsystem. Helge