From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 9 21:00:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A4AF16A505 for ; Mon, 9 May 2005 21:00:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C44F743DA7 for ; Mon, 9 May 2005 21:00:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j49L0LHm083922 for ; Mon, 9 May 2005 21:00:21 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j49L0Lgb083921; Mon, 9 May 2005 21:00:21 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 21:00:21 GMT Message-Id: <200505092100.j49L0Lgb083921@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Tilman Linneweh Subject: Re: ports/80711: misc/most: most-4.10.1 can not search X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Tilman Linneweh List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 21:00:23 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/80711; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Tilman Linneweh To: Kevin Oberman Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/80711: misc/most: most-4.10.1 can not search Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 22:48:48 +0200 * Kevin Oberman [2005-05-09 21:48]: > I sort of found the problem. > > >From configure: > if test "$ac_test_CFLAGS" = set; then > CFLAGS=$ac_save_CFLAGS > elif test $ac_cv_prog_cc_g = yes; then > if test "$GCC" = yes; then > CFLAGS="-g -O2" > else > CFLAGS="-g" > fi > else > if test "$GCC" = yes; then > CFLAGS="-O2" > else > CFLAGS= > fi > fi This is the normal configure script. The CFLAGS are set by the ports framework, so this should not be a problem. > It REALLY wants to build with -O2, but -O2 produces the failures. If I > compile without the -O2, it works fine. > > How are you compiling? I am compiling with -O, because there are too many ports that just don't work with -O2 But i just tried it with -O2 and this one still works... Anyway, I disabled building with -O2 in the port... regards tilman