From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Dec 23 08:32:57 2014
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
 id 6DD7DBEC; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 08:32:57 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 08:32:57 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r375258 - head/comms/owfs
Message-ID: <20141223083257.GA68118@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201412221837.sBMIbwow087403@svn.freebsd.org>
 <20141223020542.GA27018@FreeBSD.org>
 <20141223081644.GH43454@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20141223081644.GH43454@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,
 ports-committers@freebsd.org, Pawel Pekala <pawel@FreeBSD.org>
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head
 <svn-ports-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 08:32:57 -0000

On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 09:16:44AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 02:05:42AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 06:37:58PM +0000, Pawel Pekala wrote:
> > Why does it use bogus "gmake:lite"?  I'd really want to see these
> > obnoxious *-lite ports gone.  I didn't find the reasoning for :lite
> > in the PR, did I miss it (if yes, how feasible would it be to fix it
> > properly)?
> 
> gmake:lite is only usefull and should only be used to avoid chicken/egg
> problems basically it has been created for anything gmake can depend on
> which may itself only be buildable with gmake (textinfo for example) it
> should not at all be used in all other cases.

How feasible would be to patch textinfo and friends from gnumake'isms?  I
am willing to investigate; having a separate `devel/gmake-lite' leaf port
both looks strange and people would want to use it without giving it much
thought.

./danfe

P.S.  Baptiste, what had happened to your comma key recently?  It would be
a lot easier to read through your letters if you would've used them.