Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 08:32:57 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Pawel Pekala <pawel@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r375258 - head/comms/owfs Message-ID: <20141223083257.GA68118@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20141223081644.GH43454@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <201412221837.sBMIbwow087403@svn.freebsd.org> <20141223020542.GA27018@FreeBSD.org> <20141223081644.GH43454@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 09:16:44AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 02:05:42AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 06:37:58PM +0000, Pawel Pekala wrote: > > Why does it use bogus "gmake:lite"? I'd really want to see these > > obnoxious *-lite ports gone. I didn't find the reasoning for :lite > > in the PR, did I miss it (if yes, how feasible would it be to fix it > > properly)? > > gmake:lite is only usefull and should only be used to avoid chicken/egg > problems basically it has been created for anything gmake can depend on > which may itself only be buildable with gmake (textinfo for example) it > should not at all be used in all other cases. How feasible would be to patch textinfo and friends from gnumake'isms? I am willing to investigate; having a separate `devel/gmake-lite' leaf port both looks strange and people would want to use it without giving it much thought. ./danfe P.S. Baptiste, what had happened to your comma key recently? It would be a lot easier to read through your letters if you would've used them.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20141223083257.GA68118>