From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Feb 27 21: 8:14 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.hutchtel.net (ns1.hutchtel.net [206.9.112.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4200537B71B for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 21:08:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jpaetzel@hutchtel.net) Received: from mark9 (hutch-986.hutchtel.net [209.105.45.86]) by ns1.hutchtel.net (8.9.1/8.9.0) with SMTP id XAA09362; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 23:07:34 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <00ca01c0a20d$862637a0$6100000a@vladsempire.net> From: "Josh Paetzel" To: "Alexey Dokuchaev" Cc: References: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4-STABLE + XFree86 4.0.2 : caughting nasty signals! Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 23:07:02 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alexey Dokuchaev" To: "Josh Paetzel" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 10:26 PM Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4-STABLE + XFree86 4.0.2 : caughting nasty signals! > On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Josh Paetzel wrote: > > > sig 11s are usually a symptom of bad RAM. Try swapping it out. > > > > I thought of it, but... > > Well, I have Win2k installed on the same box, and it doesn't complain at > all. And, how to explain those 'sig 6' messages in dmesg?! > > Still, I guess I will give another memory a chance. > > file://danfe > > Remember that windows loads from high memory down, and FreeBSD loads from low memory up. Also, windows is far more likely to try and place nice with broken hardware than FreeBSD is. I don't have a clue about the sig 6s. I've never seen them before. Josh > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message