Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 07:59:25 -0700 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@scsiguy.com> To: Allan Jude <allanjude@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r279571 - head/usr.sbin/freebsd-update Message-ID: <7DB9A593-74D4-4513-9BF7-8DB76A7DB684@scsiguy.com> In-Reply-To: <201503032320.t23NKJjC059788@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201503032320.t23NKJjC059788@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mar 3, 2015, at 4:20 PM, Allan Jude <allanjude@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >=20 > Author: allanjude (doc committer) > Date: Tue Mar 3 23:20:18 2015 > New Revision: 279571 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/279571 >=20 > Log: > Add a new safetly belt to freebsd-update to prevent a user doing a = minor update (-pX) while having an unfinished major upgrade (9.x to 9.y) > Safetly belt can be disabled with the -F flag >=20 > Additionally, add the --not-running-from-cron flag they bypasses the = TTY requirement, and allows freebsd-update to be invoked by = orchestration frameworks, scripts, or otherwise. Would "=E2=80=94non-interactive" be a better name for this option? Or = maybe there is a standard option name used by other utilities to disable = the TTY check? =E2=80=94 Justin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7DB9A593-74D4-4513-9BF7-8DB76A7DB684>